Political Elites and the Contested Constitutionalization of Federalism in South Sudan: Power, Identity and Strategic Ambiguity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.620Keywords:
Federalism; political elites; South Sudan; constitutionalism; strategic constitutional ambiguity; peacebuilding.Abstract
This article attempts to examine the process of the “constitutionalization” of federalism and its implications for governance and peacebuilding as seen in the eyes of political elites. The study is of convergent mixed methods design which involves the use of a survey, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and documentary analysis. The findings suggest that political power, resource interests, political survival, identity, coalition dynamics and evolving political opportunities influence elite federalism involvement. Nevertheless 79.5%-84.0% of the respondents felt that elite opposition to federalism was characterized by a desire for central authority and political control, and 72.7% indicated that there was a gap between elite endorsement and action. Elite perspectives were also significantly associated with perceived peacebuilding outcomes (R = .433; R² = .188; p < .001), while the addition of governance factors increased the explanatory power of the model to R² = .288. The article demonstrates that federalism is not merely a constitutional design exercise but a political process. It elaborates the concept of Strategic Constitutional Ambiguity to shed light on how unresolved constitutional issues can preserve room for manoeuvre, delay the redistribution of power, and keep political options open. It also theorizes managed incompleteness as a condition in which political accommodation can be maintained even when institutional settlement remains incomplete. In turn, durable federalism requires converting political compromises into joint, participatory, and institutionalized governance.
References
1. Abdulbari, N. (2013). Identities and citizenship in Sudan: Governing constitutional principles. African Human Rights Law Journal, 13(2), 383-414.
2. Chamlagai, A. (2021). Nepal: Tarai/Madhesh movements and political elites. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(4), 949–963.
3. Di John, J., & Putzel, J. (2009). Political settlements. Governance and Social Development Resource Centre, University of Birmingham. https://gsdrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/EIRS7.pdf
4. De Chand, D. (1995). South Sudan claims for right of self-determination. University of Pennsylvania. URL: http://www. africa. upenn. edu/Articles_Gen/de_chand. html.
5. Elazar, D. J. (1987). Exploring federalism. University of Alabama Press.
6. Fessha, Y. T., & Dessalegn, B. (2022). Origins, relevance and prospects of federalism and decentralization in the Horn of Africa. Nationalities Papers, 50(5), 871–885.
7. Fiseha, A. (2019). Federalism, development and the changing political dynamics in Ethiopia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(1), 151–176.
8. Gedamu, Y. (2021). The politics of contemporary Ethiopia: Ethnic federalism and authoritarian survival. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003185765
9. IGAD. (2018). Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS). Intergovernmental Authority on Development. https://southsudan.igad.int/index.php/
10. Khan, M. H. (2010). Political settlements and the governance of growth-enhancing institutions. Growth-Enhancing Governance, SOAS, University of London.
11. Livingston, W. S. (1952). A note on the nature of federalism. Political Science Quarterly, 67(1), 81–95.
12. Ohazuruike, K. (2022). Leadership and power sharing in Nigerian federalism: Issues and perspectives. Journal of Global Social Sciences, 3(11), 75–87.
13. Suberu, R. (2023). Federalism, constitutional reform, and the elusive quest for ‘political restructuring’ in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic. In W. Adebanwi et al. (Eds.), Democracy and Nigeria’s Fourth Republic: Governance, Political Economy, and Party Politics 1999–2023 (pp. 56–84). Boydell & Brewer.
14. Republic of South Sudan. (2011). The Transitional Constitution of the Republic of South Sudan, 2011. https://mop.gov.ss/download/pubs/SS_Transitional_Constitution.pdf
15. Umaner-Duba, G. (2021). Managing ethno-national diversity in Cyprus: Asymmetrical federalism. Nationalities Papers, 49(1), 180–198.
16. Zahrin, Z., & Mohamed, A. M. (2022). Federalism: A Conceptual and Theoretical
Perspective. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 7(30), 225-
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Auhor(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated. Authors retain copyright of their work and grant JAMS the right of first publication.
