Perceived Effects of Kidnapping on Security and Public Safety in Nigeria: Evidence from Ondo State
Keywords:
Kidnapping, Security, Public Safety, Perception, Ondo State, NigeriaAbstract
Kidnapping has metamorphosed from an isolated criminal act into a structured and organised threat that shapes how Nigerians experience security and public safety, and Ondo State, once regarded as one of the most peaceful states in south-western Nigeria, has in recent years witnessed a disturbing escalation of abductions along the Akure–Owo–Benin corridor and the forested axes of Akoko, Ose and Idanre. This study examined residents' perceptions of the effects of kidnapping on security and public safety in Ondo State, Nigeria. Anchored on Routine Activity Theory and Social Contract Theory, the study adopted a cross-sectional descriptive survey design. Five kidnapping-prone local government areas (Akure South, Akure North, Owo, Ose and Akoko South-West) were purposively selected, and 400 adult residents were sampled from them through proportionate stratified random sampling with systematic selection within wards and communities; 384 copies of a structured four-point Likert questionnaire were correctly completed and analysed (96.0% response rate; pilot Cronbach's alpha = 0.81). Data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations, and Chi-square tests of independence at the 0.05 level, with Cramér's V reported as the effect size. Respondents perceived unemployment, porous forest reserves, weak inter-agency intelligence coordination and the lucrative ransom economy as the most important drivers of kidnapping (grand mean = 3.39); reported that kidnapping has heightened fear, reduced confidence in security agencies and restricted free movement (grand mean = 3.34); perceived severe socio-economic and psychological costs for victims and communities (grand mean = 3.30); rated the effectiveness of security agencies as low (grand mean = 2.31); and rated community policing, intelligence-led technology, youth economic empowerment and stricter law enforcement as the most viable strategies (grand mean = 3.52). The perceived frequency of kidnapping incidents was significantly associated with perceived public safety (χ²(9, N = 384) = 42.586, p < .001, Cramér's V = 0.19), as was trust in security agencies with perceived effectiveness (χ²(4, N = 384) = 51.203, p < .001, V = 0.26), whereas education level was not significantly associated with perceptions of kidnapping's effects on security (χ²(6, N = 384) = 8.114, p = .230, V = 0.10). These are associations among self-reported perceptions in a cross-sectional sample and do not establish causal relationships. The study concludes that kidnapping is perceived as a structural threat to security and public safety in the sampled areas of Ondo State, with no significant difference by education level, and recommends intelligence-driven community policing, forest security reform, youth empowerment and strengthened multi-agency coordination as measures for restoring public safety.
References
1. Adediran, A. A., & Alabi, M. O. A. (2026). Kidnapping and policy inefficiency on kidnapping cases: A study of Ondo State, Nigeria. Tanzanian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(1).
2. Andrew, S. U., Egbe, D., Atu, E. E., Ukpa, U., & Okon, O. N. (2024). Vigilantism and property crimes in Calabar South Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria. Journal of the Management Sciences, 61(9), 95–112.
3. Badmus, B. (2025). Community-based security and curbing of kidnapping in Oke-Ogun, Oyo State, Nigeria. Rima, 4(1).
4. Bamidele, S., Ajisafe, D., & Ajiboye, B. M. (2024). Kidnapping and hostage negotiation in Nigeria. In J. S. Omotola & S. Oyewole (Eds.), The political economy of kidnapping and insecurity in Nigeria (pp. 299–313). Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development.
5. Charles, A. O., Eziakor, M., & Okafor, J. C. (2025). Community policing, improved security and public safety in Anambra State, Nigeria, 2014–2023. International Journal of Education Research and Scientific Development, 7(2), 56–86.
6. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
9. Cramér, H. (1946). Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press.
10. Ejirefe, I., & Egwuaba, E. U. (2023). Impact of kidnapping on access to education in Etche Local Government Area of Rivers State, Nigeria. Journal of Education, Humanities, Management and Social Sciences, 1(3), 23–35.
11. Financial Action Task Force. (2024). Financial flows from kidnap for ransom: Nigeria case study. FATF.
12. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In Proceedings of the Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education (pp. 82–88).
13. National Bureau of Statistics. (2022). National crime statistics report. NBS.
14. Okwuwada, N. (2023). The modern day consequences, causes, and nature of kidnapping, terrorism, banditry, and violent crime in Nigeria: A comprehensive analysis (MPRA Paper No. 117671). Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
15. Osegboun, A. E., & Oladipo, T. D. (2023). The impact of kidnapping for ransom on Nigeria's image. African Journal of Stability & Development.
16. Wahlrab, A. (2023). Social contract theory. In Handbook of the Anthropocene: Humans between heritage and future (pp. 1207–1210). Springer International Publishing.
17. Welsh, B. (2024). Taking civilians: Terrorist kidnapping in civil war. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae074. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae074
18. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Auhor(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated. Authors retain copyright of their work and grant JAMS the right of first publication.
