Water Quality Assessment of the Kwa River, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria: Implications for Naval Operations, Amphibious Training, and Civil Engineering Construction

Authors

  • Akwa Anyoghe Enya Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ugep, Cross River State, Nigeria Author
  • Odum Lawrence Odum Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ugep, Cross River State, Nigeria Author
  • Simon Ellah Egomo Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Ugep, Cross River State, Nigeria Author

Keywords:

Kwa River, Calabar, water quality, naval base, amphibious training, civil engineering construction, concrete water, river pollution, Cross River State, Nigeria, infrastructure durability, construction materials

Abstract

This study presents a water quality assessment of the Kwa River in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria, focused on a sampling location near the Nigerian Naval Base and Amphibious Training School. The river serves two functions of direct engineering interest: military training, including amphibious exercises and personnel water-survival training, and civil engineering construction water supply for concrete production, soil compaction, equipment cooling, and dust suppression at infrastructure sites across Calabar municipality. A composite water sample was analysed for physical, chemical, and microbial parameters and compared against Nigerian Industrial Standard (NIS) limits for potable water and, separately, against widely cited construction-water benchmarks. The results show an acidic pH of 5.00, turbidity of 29.40 NTU (488% above the 5 NTU screening limit), nitrite at 0.21 mg/L, total coliform at 18 CFU/100 mL, and dissolved oxygen of 2.82 mg/L, all outside their respective NIS limits. A companion hydrographic survey established six spatial reference points (P1-P6) around the sampling location, providing elevation and coordinate control that helps explain probable pollutant-transport pathways and lays the groundwork for a spatially resolved monitoring programme. Screening-level indices computed from the chemistry - an Aggressiveness Index of 7.4 (classified as highly aggressive water), a turbidity-based pollution index of 488%, and a sulfate-acidity ratio of 8.73 - indicate that the water is chemically unsuited to direct use as concrete mixing or curing water without treatment, though this study stops short of the mortar and concrete performance testing that would be required to confirm the magnitude of any resulting deterioration. The findings point to compound implications for military operations, construction durability, public health, and aquatic ecosystem integrity, and they support a recommendation for water treatment, replicate and seasonal monitoring, and confirmatory concrete-performance testing before the river is relied upon as a construction water source.

22 7

References

1. ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.

2. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, & Water Environment Federation. (2023). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (24th ed.). APHA.

3. ASTM International. (2022). Standard specification for mixing water used in the production of hydraulic cement concrete (ASTM C1602/C1602M-22). ASTM International.

4. Blueprint Newspapers Limited. (2016, June 30). CFTZ, Navy to partner on maritime security. Blueprint Newspapers.

5. Cross River State Government. (2026, March 9). Maritime security: Gov Otu pledges strategic collaboration with Amphibious Training School. Cross River State Government.

6. Desoteux, M., Bertron, A., Lacarrière, L., Roosz, C., and Robin, A. (2026). Spatial distribution of potable water chemistry and aggressiveness indices in France using a novel visualisation tool of the SISE-Eaux database. AQUA - Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society, 75(6), 293-320.

7. Edet, A., Ukpong, A., and Nganje, T. (2013). Hydrochemical studies of Cross River Basin (southeastern Nigeria) river systems using cross plots, statistics and water quality index. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70(7), 3137-3148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2365-4

8. Ekpo, P. B., Etangetuk, N. A., Chinyere, O. A., Effiong, N. M., Ekpo, I. P., Okey, F. O., Bebie, O. E., Job, I. E., and Adie, E. A. (2024). Effects of municipal waste discharge and its re-suspension on water quality in the Great Kwa River estuary, Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.910008

9. Ekpo, P. B., Umoyen, A. J., Akpan, N. G., Ekpo, I. P., Abu, G., & Sunday, C. J. (2021). Evaluation of pollution load: Heavy metal contents and physiochemical properties of the Great Kwa River, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 11(2), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i230356

10. Emeka, C. N., Emeka, V. I., and Asukwo, I. E. (2026). Physicochemical characteristics of the Great Kwa River (Gulf of Guinea): Controls of tidal dynamics and environmental sustainability in a tropical mesotidal system. Communication in Physical Sciences, 13(7), 1139-1160.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21390163

11. Ephraim, B. E., and Ajayi, O. (2015). Compositional evaluation and quality status of surface waters of Mbat-Abiati and Oberekkai Creeks of the Great Kwa River, southeastern Nigeria. Advances in Applied Science Research, 6(6).

12. National Building and Research Institute (NBRRI). (2026). Framework for building collapse investigation and proffered mitigation measures for Nigeria: The NBRRI approach. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering.

13. Nigerian Army. (2022). Nigerian Army training policy. Nigerian Army Training and Doctrine Command.

14. Odey, M. O., Mgbe, P. T., Adindu, E. A., Osim, M. E., Ofutet, E. O., Ibor, M. E., Waithanji, R., Itam, E. H., and Omoriri, M. A. (2024). Seasonal assessment of pollution status, bioaccumulation and potential human health risk of heavy metals in shrimps (Penaeus monodon) and water from the Great Kwa River in Calabar, Nigeria. African Journal of Biomedical Research, 27(2), 407-414.

15. Stanley, H. O., Immanuel, O. M., and Nwagboso, A. (2017). Water quality assessment of the New Calabar River. Journal of Applied Life Sciences International, 15(2), 1-5.

https://doi.org/10.9734/JALSI/2017/38054

16. Tyagi, S., Sharma, B., Singh, P., and Dobhal, R. (2013). Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index. American Journal of Water Resources, 1(3), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajwr-1-3-3

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29

How to Cite

Water Quality Assessment of the Kwa River, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria: Implications for Naval Operations, Amphibious Training, and Civil Engineering Construction. (2026). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS), 1(2), Page 2055-2067. https://jamsjournal.org/JAMS/article/view/621

Similar Articles

21-30 of 255

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)