Seasonal and Treatment Effects on Soil pH under Potato Production in Kitale, Kenya: A Randomized Block Analysis with Multiple Comparisons

Authors

  • Waithera Rosalia Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Machakos University, Machakos, Kenya Author
  • Mungau Martin Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) FCRI – P.O. Box 450-30200, Kitale; Kenya Author
  • Kasina Martin Kalro Fcrc Alupe, P.O. Box 278-50400, Busia, Kenya Author
  • Thomas Kwambai Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844-001000, Nairobi, Kenya Author
  • Mary Kifuko-Koech Machakos University image/svg+xml Author
  • Keziah Ndungu-Magiroi Machakos University image/svg+xml Author
  • Jane Mugwe Machakos University image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.710

Keywords:

soil pH, potato production, fertilizer treatments, FYM, Calcipril, RCBD, Kitale, Kenya, Tukey HSD, Dunnett test

Abstract

Soil pH is important as a measure of the soil chemical condition and will affect the availability of soil nutrients and fertilizer efficiency. This study evaluated the effects of eight fertilizer treatments on soil pH under potato production in Kitale, Trans Nzoia County, Kenya. A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) experiment was applied, having 5 replications across two production seasons. The treatments consisted of farmers’ practice, Baraka, Baraka + Calcipril, DAP, DAP + Calcipril, Yara, ½ DAP + ½ CAN + FYM, and FYM at 10 t/ha. Overall ANOVA showed significant effects of treatment (????7,60 = 4.919, ???? < 0.001), season (????1,60 = 269.853, ???? < 0.001), replication (????4,60 = 86.481, ???? < 0.001), and treatment × season interaction (????7,60 = 3.224, ???? = 0.0057). In Season 1, treatment effects on post-production soil pH were not significant (????7,28 = 1.961, ???? = 0.097), whereas replication was significant (????4,28 = 36.872, ???? < 0.001). Treatment effects were also significant during Season 2 (F7,28=6.504; ???? < 0.001), with FYM showing significant higher pH than some treatments. The FYM treatment was found to be significantly different from the farmer practice by Dunnett’s test (???? = 0.0051). The results indicated that fertilizer effects on soil pH also depended on production season.

31 12

References

1. James Mugo, Nancy Karanja, Charles Gachene, Klaus Dittert, and Elmar Schulte-Geldermann. Clustering of the chemical properties of small-scale farm soils to develop fertilizer blend ratios. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 7, 01 2024. doi: 10.1002/agg2.20468.

2. J Kihara, P Bolo, Michael Kinyua, Sylvia Sarah Nyawira, and Rolf Sommer. Soil health and ecosystem services: Lessons from sub-sahara africa (ssa). Geoderma, 370:114342, 2020.

3. Yi Gao, Lu Tan, Fang Liu, Qian Li, Xiaocheng Wei, Liyuan Liu, Houyu Li, Xiangqun Zheng, and Yan Xu. Optimization of the proportion of multi-component rural solid wastes in mixed composting using a simplex centroid design. Bioresource Technology, 341:125746, 2021. ISSN 0960-8524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125746.

4. Thomas K. Kwambai, Paul C. Struik, Denis Griffin, Laura Stack, Selly Rono, Moses Nyongesa, Caroline Brophy, and Monica Gorman. Understanding potato production practices in north-western kenya through surveys: An important key to improving production. Potato Research, 66(3):751–791, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11540-022-09599-0.

Downloads

Published

08-10-2026

How to Cite

Seasonal and Treatment Effects on Soil pH under Potato Production in Kitale, Kenya: A Randomized Block Analysis with Multiple Comparisons. (2026). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS), 1(III), Page 259-272. https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.710

Similar Articles

61-70 of 199

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.