From Chemistry 4.0 to Chemistry 5.0: Digital Transformation, Sustainability, and Human-Centred Innovation

Authors

  • Luana Costa de Souza Master’s in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Author
  • Vithórya Monteiro dos Reis Postgraduate student in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Author
  • Paula Cristina Santana Cardilli Postgraduate student in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Author
  • Boutros Sarrouh Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering/DQBIO, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil Author
  • Renata Carolina Zanetti Lofrano Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Alto Paraopeba Campus, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil Author

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, circular economy, digital twins, green chemistry, human-centred innovation, sustainable chemical engineering

Abstract

Chemistry 5.0 connects digital chemical technologies with measurable sustainability, human-centred design, and operational resilience. This critical narrative review examines artificial intelligence, autonomous experimentation, digital twins, green chemistry, and circular resource use across chemical research and process engineering. Foundational and recent literature is synthesized through four analytical domains: digital capability, environmental performance, human oversight, and resilience. The review proposes an implementation framework that links data and models to explicit design constraints, validation, decision authority, and life-cycle boundaries. Two technology and implementation tables map capabilities to benefits, risks, and staged actions. The resulting framework identifies practical indicators for yield, material intensity, safety, data quality, workforce participation, and system robustness. These indicators require documented baselines and system boundaries; the framework itself has not yet been empirically validated. Chemistry 5.0 is therefore presented as a testable approach for directing digital tools toward safer and more sustainable chemical processes, with future research needed to compare measured outcomes across scales.

13 2

Author Biographies

  • Vithórya Monteiro dos Reis, Postgraduate student in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

    Master’s in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

  • Paula Cristina Santana Cardilli, Postgraduate student in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

    Postgraduate student in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

  • Boutros Sarrouh, Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering/DQBIO, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Postgraduate student in Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

  • Renata Carolina Zanetti Lofrano, Department of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Alto Paraopeba Campus, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering/DQBIO, Federal University of São João del-Rei, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais, Brazil

     

References

1. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. “Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry.” Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2777/308407

2. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M. “Industry 4.0.” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), pp. 239–242, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4

3. Häse, F., Roch, L. M., Aspuru-Guzik, A. “Next-generation experimentation with self-driving laboratories.” Trends in Chemistry, 1(3), pp. 282–291, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2019.02.007

4. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., Nee, A. Y. C. “Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), pp. 2405–2415, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186

5. Anastas, P. T., Warner, J. C. “Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice.” Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.

6. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. “Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, pp. 221–232, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

7. von Stosch, M., Oliveira, R., Peres, J., Feyo de Azevedo, S. “Hybrid semi-parametric modeling in process systems engineering: Past, present and future.” Computers & Chemical Engineering, 60, pp. 86–101, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.08.008

8. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., Wang, L. “Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, pp. 530–535, 2021.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006

9. Nahavandi, S. “Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution.” Sustainability, 11(16), 4371, 2019.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371

10. Sheldon, R. A. “The E factor 25 years on: The rise of green chemistry and sustainability.” Green Chemistry, 19(1), pp. 18–43, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC02157C

Downloads

Published

15-10-2026

How to Cite

From Chemistry 4.0 to Chemistry 5.0: Digital Transformation, Sustainability, and Human-Centred Innovation. (2026). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS), 1(III), Page 615-623. https://jamsjournal.org/JAMS/article/view/738

Similar Articles

111-120 of 222

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.