Spatial Injustice and Active Ageing: Examining the Age-Friendliness of Colonial Urban Legacies in Harare's Segregated Suburbs

Authors

  • Fannuel Tinashe Chimwamurombe Department of Community and Social Development, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe Author
  • Erick Sakarombe Department of Community and Social Development, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe Author
  • James Mupanga Department of Community and Social Development, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe Author
  • Sandisiwe Masuku Department of Community and Social Development, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe Author

Keywords:

colonial urban planning, age-friendly cities, spatial justice

Abstract

This paper interrogates the intersection between colonial urban planning legacies and contemporary age-friendliness in Harare, Zimbabwe, examining how Rhodesian-era spatial engineering continues to shape differential ageing experiences across socioeconomically stratified neighbourhoods four decades after independence. Employing the World Health Organization’s Age-Friendly Cities framework across eight domains-outdoor spaces, transportation, housing, social participation, respect and inclusion, civic participation, communication, and health services-this study compares formerly white suburbs with historical African townships, including Mbare, Mabvuku, and Highfield. The analysis reveals stark disparities in infrastructure quality, service accessibility, and social amenities that systematically disadvantage township older persons whilst privileging historically white suburb residents. These patterns demonstrate that colonial spatial apartheid has metamorphosed into persistent gerontological injustice, fundamentally constraining older Zimbabweans’ capacity for active ageing in low-income areas. The paper argues that addressing age-friendliness in postcolonial African cities necessitates explicit confrontation with inherited spatial injustices through transformative urban planning prioritising spatial equity alongside age-inclusive design.

10 1

References

REFERENCES

1. Adlakha, D., Sarmiento, O., & Sánchez Franco, S. (2021). The rising challenge of ageing cities: Urban planning and public health in the Global South. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(3), 345-364.

2. Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing “age-friendly” cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597-617.

3. Chipkin, I., & Lipietz, B. (2012). Transforming South Africa’s racial bureaucracy: New public management and public sector reform in contemporary South Africa. PARI Long Essays, 1, 1-44.

4. Christopher, A. J. (2001). Urban segregation in post-apartheid South Africa. Urban Studies, 38(3), 449-466.

5. Fainstein, S. (2010). The Just City. Cornell University Press.

6. Home, R. (2013). Of Planting and Planning: The Making of British Colonial Cities (2nd ed.). Routledge.

7. Kalache, A., Barreto, S. M., & Keller, I. (2010). Global ageing: The demographic revolution in all cultures and societies. In P. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Gerontology (pp. 30-46). SAGE.

8. Kamete, A. Y. (2007). Cold-hearted, negligent and spineless? Planning, planners and the (r)ejection of “filth” in urban Zimbabwe. International Planning Studies, 12(2), 153-171.

9. Kamete, A. Y. (2021). Harare’s trajectory of decline. Environment and Urbanization, 33(1), 237-254.

10. Kanyepe, J. (2023). Examining the relationship between traffic congestion and residential density in Harare metropolitan region, Zimbabwe. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 7(1), 103-117.

11. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.

12. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105-113.

13. Marondedze, C., & Schütt, B. (2019). Dynamics of land use and land cover changes in Harare, Zimbabwe: A case study on the linkage between drivers and the axis of urban expansion. Land, 8(9), 133.

14. Marston, H., & van Hoof, J. (2019). “Who doesn't think about technology when designing urban environments for older people?” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO Age-Friendly Cities model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3525.

15. Matamanda, A. R. (2020). Evolving urban citizenship rights in Zimbabwe: The new constitution and the rise of the middle class. African Geographical Review, 39(2), 1358-154.

16. Matamanda, A. R., & Chinozvina, Q. T. (2020). Urban agriculture and spatial justice in Harare, Zimbabwe. Land Use Policy, 91, 104358.

17. Mokomane, Z. (2013). Anti-social families or democratisation of families? Professional discourses and lived realities. Current Sociology, 61(4), 446-462.

18. Mudege, N. N., & Ezeh, A. C. (2009). Gender, aging, poverty and health: Survival strategies of older men and women in Nairobi slums. Journal of Aging Studies, 23(4), 245-257.

19. Mupedziswa, R., & Gumbo, P. (2022). Ageing in Zimbabwe: The lived realities in the context of economic hardships. In J. Dhemba & P. Gumbo (Eds.), Social Development in Zimbabwe (pp. 178-199). Langaa RPCIG.

20. Myers, G. A. (2011). African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice. Zed Books.

21. Naah, F. L., Njong, A. M., & Kimengsi, J. N. (2020). Determinants of active and healthy ageing in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Cameroon. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3038.

22. Njoh, A. J. (2009). Urban planning as a tool of power and social control in colonial Africa. Planning Perspectives, 24(3), 301-317.

23. Plouffe, L., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age-friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5), 733-739.

24. Schatz, E., & Seeley, J. (2015). Gender, ageing and carework in East and Southern Africa: A review. Global Public Health, 10(10), 1185-1200.

25. Scheper-Hughes, N., & Bourgois, P. (2004). Violence in War and Peace: An Anthology. Blackwell.

26. Sixsmith, J., & Sixsmith, A. (2008). Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 32(3), 219-235.

27. Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. University of Minnesota Press.

28. Turok, I. (2018). Continuity and change in South Africa’s urban system. In I. Turok, J. Borel-Saladin, & J. Crankshaw (Eds.), Confronting Spatial Inequality in South Africa (pp. 19-42). Routledge.

29. Warth, L. (2016). Adapting the WHO age-friendly communities model in rural Montana. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 28(4), 303-316.

30. World Health Organization [WHO] (2007). Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. WHO Press.

31. World Health Organization [WHO] (2015). World Report on Ageing and Health. WHO Press.

32. World Health Organization [WHO] (2019). Global Network for Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. WHO Press.

33. Yoshikuni, T. (2007). African Urban Experiences in Colonial Zimbabwe: A Social History of Harare Before 1925. Weaver Press.

34. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency [ZIMSTAT] & UNFPA (2017). Population Projections Thematic Report. ZIMSTAT.

35. Zimmer, Z., & Dayton, J. (2005). Older persons in sub-Saharan Africa living with children and grandchildren. Population Studies, 59(3), 295-312

Downloads

Published

23-10-2026

How to Cite

Spatial Injustice and Active Ageing: Examining the Age-Friendliness of Colonial Urban Legacies in Harare’s Segregated Suburbs. (2026). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS), 1(III), Page 990-1003. https://jamsjournal.org/JAMS/article/view/793

Similar Articles

61-70 of 157

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)