Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability in Nigeria

Authors

  • Igbadoo David FEDERALUNIVERSITY LAFIA NASARAWA STATE Author
  • Shaibu Ali Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • Abdulkareem Alhassan Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • Eko Omini Eko Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.242

Abstract

This paper re-examines the Energy-Led Growth Hypothesis and the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for Nigeria by jointly modelling the relationship between renewable energy consumption, real output, and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The empirical analysis draws on annual series spanning 1990-2025 for contextual description and a quarterly estimation sample covering 2010Q1-2025Q4, a period that brackets Nigeria's most consequential energy-policy reforms, including the Petroleum Industry Act (2021), the Electricity Act (2023), and the 2060 Energy Transition Plan. Using an Auto-regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds-testing framework, the study estimates a log-linear emissions equation nesting a quadratic income term (to test the EKC), renewable energy consumption, gross fixed capital formation, and the labour force. Augmented Dickey-Fuller tests confirm that all five series are integrated of order one, I(1); the ARDL bounds-testing procedure is nonetheless retained because it remains valid under a uniform I(1) system as well as under mixed orders of integration, and it performs well in small samples. The bounds F-statistic (0.435) lies below the lower critical bound at the 10, 5, and 1 percent levels, so the null hypothesis of no long-run levels relationship cannot be rejected: over the estimation window, emissions, output, and renewable energy consumption do not settle into a stable long-run equilibrium. Short-run dynamics are nonetheless informative and statistically well behaved: emissions are highly persistent, renewable energy consumption carries a significant positive contemporaneous coefficient that reverses sign at one lag, and the labour force shows an analogous sign reversal, while capital formation and output are not significant in the short run. Economically, this pattern is consistent with new renewable capacity running alongside, rather than displacing, legacy fossil-fuel generation, so that its net emissions payoff stays small until older capacity is retired. Post-estimation diagnostics reject neither ARCH effects nor serial correlation, supporting the reliability of the short-run estimates. The absence of a long-run levels relationship is interpreted not as evidence that energy policy is irrelevant to emissions outcomes, but as a symptom of Nigeria's institutional implementation gap: renewable penetration remains too shallow, and too unevenly enforced, to anchor a stable long-run growth–emissions nexus. The paper closes with policy recommendations for deepening renewable integration and strengthening the institutional architecture required to convert short-run energy dynamics into a durable, low-carbon growth path.Keywords: Renewable energy consumption; Economic growth; CO2 emissions; Environmental Kuznets Curve; ARDL bounds testing; NigeriaJEL Classification: Q42 (Alternative Energy Sources); Q43 (Energy and the Macroeconomy); Q56 (Environmental and Sustainable Development); O13 (Economic Development: Agriculture, Natural Resources, Energy, Environment); O55 (Economic Development: Africa); C22 (Time-Series Models: Single Equations)

23 8

References

References

1. Beghabo, P. (2017). Energy and the economy: A study on industrial development and power access. Academic Press.

2. Ajayi, A., et al. (2022). Nigeria's energy sector: Vulnerability to climate change and governance challenges. Journal of Energy Policy, 12(4), 112–125.

3. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2020). Renewable energy and economic growth: Global perspectives on decoupling. IRENA Publications.

4. Sylvester, B. A. (2026). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth in Nigeria. Federal University Otuoke Journal of Management Sciences, 5(1), 403–415.

5. Nwafor, C., & Igwe, K. (2022). Green energy adoption and local economic development: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(2), 45–60.

6. Oloruntuyi, A. O. (2026). Nigeria's transition to renewable energy: Macroeconomic effects and energy poverty. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics Research, 9(1), 742–758.

7. Xie, P., Zhu, Z., Hu, G., & Huang, J. (2022). Renewable energy and economic growth hypothesis: Evidence from N-11 countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2121741

8. Musa, I. (2026). Renewable energy transition in Nigeria: Public perception, community engagement, and strategies for achieving sustainable economic development. UKR Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 14(1), 108–122.

9. Olusanya, S. O. (2026). Renewable energy and sustainable development in Nigeria: An analysis of institutional and economic drivers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(3), 89–104.

10. Bloomfield Law. (2026). Outlook for the Nigerian energy sector, 2026. Bloomfield Law Practice.

11. Aluko & Oyebode. (2026). Nigeria energy sector review: H2 2025–2026 strategic outlook. Aluko & Oyebode Legal Practitioners.

12. Templars Law. (2026). Nigeria's energy transition plan. Templars Knowledge Centre.

13. SweetCrudeReports. (2026). Nigeria must act faster on environmental challenges — DG, Climate Change.

14. Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy and Development, 3(2), 401–403.

15. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.

16. Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17–49.

17. Stern, D. I. (2011). The role of energy in economic growth. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219(1), 26–51.

18. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 3914.

19. Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S. R., Ozturk, I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733–741.

20. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.

21. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector auto-regressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250.

22. MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and co-integration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601–618.

Cover Image

Downloads

Published

2026-09-12

How to Cite

Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability in Nigeria. (2026). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS), 1(2), Page 1140-1153. https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.242