A Multilevel Stylistic Analysis of the Language of Worship in Selected Hillsongs

Authors

  • Dr. Jimboy B. Pagalilauan Associate Professor I- College of Arts and Sciences, Cavite State University – Indang, Cvaite, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.660

Keywords:

Linguistic Stylistics, language of worship, Hillsong songs, stylistic analysis

Abstract

This study analyzed the language of worship in five selected Hillsong songs: Oceans (Where Feet May Fail), What a Beautiful Name, Who You Say I Am, So Will I (100 Billion X), and Cornerstone. It used Linguistic Stylistics as the overarching framework and employed a qualitative descriptive approach to examine the songs at four linguistic levels: lexical, syntactic, semantic, and discourse. The analysis covered diction and word choice, repetition, pronoun use, emotive and evaluative expressions, sentence and clause structures, parallelism, coordination and subordination, metaphor, symbolism, personification, imagery, address and reference to God, speaker–addressee relationships, thematic progression, and recurring discourse patterns.

The analysis found that religious, relational, emotive, and evaluative vocabulary plays a central role in expressing faith, worship, identity, praise, dependence, and relationship with God. Repetition, parallelism, and recurring syntactic structures give emphasis to key ideas and contribute to rhythm and memorability. Metaphor, symbolism, personification, and imagery make abstract religious concepts more concrete through images of water, storms, foundations, creation, freedom, and family. At the discourse level, God or Jesus is frequently positioned as a central subject or addressee. The songs also develop recurring patterns, including human uncertainty moving toward divine assurance, divine action followed by human response, and previous conditions leading to transformed identity. Furthermore, the lexical, syntactic, semantic, and discourse features contribute to meanings associated with praise, trust, dependence, identity, gratitude, devotion, and surrender. The study concludes that Linguistic Stylistics offers a useful way of examining how different linguistic choices work together in the construction and expression of worship in contemporary Christian song lyrics.

 

Views: 8Downloads: 2

References

1. Aslan, U. (2018). Metaphors and meaning in the Turkish contemporary Christian music. Musicologist, 2(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.33906/musicologist.439254

2. Cowan, N. (2017). “Heaven and earth collide”: Hillsong Music’s evolving theological emphases. PNEUMA, 39(1–2), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700747-03901001

3. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269

4. Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762949

5. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4

6. Leech, G. N., & Short, M. H. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.

7. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910

8. Omotayo, O. A. (2023). Conceptual metaphors in some Christian praise/worship songs in Nigeria. Lead Journal of Languages and Literature, 1(1), 97–104.

9. Palayon, R. T., & Dalona, I. M. F. (2025). The language of praise and worship: A corpus analysis of register variation in Christian songs. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 30(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v30i2.477

10. Sharndama, E. C., & Onyinyechi, O. I. (2018). Analysis of the syntactic features of selected Christian praise and worship songs. Ahyu: A Journal of Language and Literature, 2, 59–66.

https://doi.org/10.56666/ahyu.v2i.81

11. Tönsing, J. G., Wepener, C. J., & Vos, C. (2015). The “cognitive” and the “emotive” component in Christian songs: Tracing the shifts in traditional and contemporary songs. Verbum et Ecclesia, 36(1), Article 1308. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v36i1.1308

12. Wang, X., & Zhang, L. (2019). A comparative study of interpersonal meanings of traditional hymns and contemporary Christian songs in China. Text & Talk, 39(6), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-0240

Downloads

Published

26-10-2026

How to Cite

A Multilevel Stylistic Analysis of the Language of Worship in Selected Hillsongs. (2026). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS), 1(III), Page 1064-1080. https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.660

Similar Articles

21-30 of 243

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)