Integrating Commerce, Work and Public Life: A Sustainable Mixed-Use High-Rise Development Framework for Gazipur, Bangladesh

Authors

  • Md Shakil Mahmud B.Arch. Graduate, Department of Architecture, Southeast University (SEU), Dhaka, Bangladesh Author

Keywords:

Gazipur; mixed-use development; high-rise architecture; vertical urbanism; sustainable architecture; public life; climate-responsive design; land-use efficiency; urban heat; Bangladesh.

Abstract

Rapid urbanization, industrial expansion and increasing pressure on land are transforming Gazipur into a complex metropolitan-industrial landscape. This paper develops the earlier Gazipur Sky Center thesis and a subsequent research-paper draft into a more explicit design-research framework for a mixed-use high-rise that integrates commerce, work and public life. The study uses qualitative, case-based architectural research: evidence from the supplied thesis, published urban and environmental literature, functional programming, climate-responsive design principles, mobility hierarchy, life-safety logic and conceptual performance indicators are translated into an integrated architectural model. The thesis site at Rongilabazar, Mulaid, Sreepur, Gazipur is approximately 242,842 ft² (about 5.5 acres) and was originally programmed as a shopping mall and corporate-office development. Published evidence cited in the supplied draft reports that urban area in Gazipur Sadar increased from 61.3 km² in 1999 to 118.3 km² in 2024, while water bodies and vegetation declined and summer land-surface temperature increased. The developed framework therefore treats density, ecological performance, public space, mobility and adaptability as interdependent rather than separate design problems. The proposed model uses an active public ground plane, retail podium, shared transition floors, flexible office tower, separated service and emergency circulation, shaded façades, green terraces, rainwater management and coordinated building systems. A mathematical assessment framework is provided for FAR, site coverage, green coverage, public-realm ratio, functional diversity, land-use efficiency, pedestrian accessibility, green-to-hardscape ratio and future energy-use intensity. Three conceptual heat maps demonstrate how thermal exposure, activity intensity and combined environmental-design priority can be used as decision-support layers. Because no georeferenced site thermal raster, pedestrian-count survey, traffic model or calibrated building simulation was supplied, the heat maps and design scores are explicitly conceptual rather than measured results. The paper concludes that sustainable vertical development in Gazipur should be judged by the coordination of land efficiency, public life, climate response, mobility, safety, resilience and long-term adaptability, not by building height alone.

0 0

References

1. ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.

2. Al-Masrani, S. M., Al-Obaidi, K. M., Zalin, N. A., & Isma, M. I. A. (2018). Design optimization of solar shading systems for tropical office buildings: Challenges and future trends. Solar Energy, 170, 849–872.

3. Ali, M. M., & Armstrong, P. J. (2008). Overview of sustainable design factors in high-rise buildings. CTBUH 8th World Congress Proceedings.

4. Ali, M. M., & Moon, K. S. (2007). Structural developments in tall buildings: Current trends and future prospects. Architectural Science Review, 50(3), 205–223.

5. ASHRAE. (2022). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2022: Ventilation and acceptable indoor air quality.

6. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Population and housing census 2022: National report, Volume 1.

7. Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Island Press.

8. Bibri, S. E. (2020). Compact urbanism and the synergic potential of its integration with data-driven smart urbanism. Land Use Policy, 97, 104703.

9. Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2020). Compact city planning and development. Developments in the Built Environment, 4, 100021.

10. Burton, E. (2002). Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities. Environment and Planning B, 29(2), 219–250.

11. Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D, 2(3), 199–219.

12. Ching, F. D. K. (2014). Architecture: Form, space, and order (4th ed.). Wiley.

13. Coupland, A. (Ed.). (1997). Reclaiming the city: Mixed use development. E & FN Spon.

14. Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2010). The social dimension of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300.

15. Duffy, F. (1997). The new office. Conran Octopus.

16. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.

17. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.

18. Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.

19. Geyer, H. S. (2024). The theory and praxis of mixed-use development: An integrative literature review. Cities, 147, 104774.

20. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. (2020). Bangladesh National Building Code 2020. Ministry of Housing and Public Works.

21. Grant, J. (2002). Mixed use in theory and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), 71–84.

22. Habraken, N. J. (1972). Supports: An alternative to mass housing. Architectural Press.

23. Hoppenbrouwer, E., & Louw, E. (2005). Mixed-use development: Theory and practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands. European Planning Studies, 13(7), 967–983.

24. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.

25. Jabareen, Y. R. (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 38–52.

26. Jayaweera, N., Rajapaksha, U., & Manthilake, I. (2021). Enhancing daylight and energy performance of external shading devices in dense urban tropics. Journal of Green Building, 16(3), 87–108.

27. Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, K. (Eds.). (1996). The compact city: A sustainable urban form? E & FN Spon.

28. Lechner, N. (2015). Heating, cooling, lighting: Sustainable design methods for architects (4th ed.). Wiley.

29. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.

30. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116.

31. National Fire Protection Association. (2021). NFPA 101: Life safety code.

32. Neuman, M. (2005). The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 11–26.

33. Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press.

34. Oke, T. R. (1988). Street design and urban canopy layer climate. Energy and Buildings, 11(1–3), 103–113.

35. Oldfield, P., Trabucco, D., & Wood, A. (2009). Five energy generations of tall buildings. Journal of Architecture, 14(5), 591–613.

36. Parvin, M. A., Haque, M. I., Hossain, M. A., & Bashar, A. (2023). Index-based change detection, spatial zoning and environmental criticality of urban land cover: Gazipur Sadar Upazila. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 27(10), 145–163.

37. Rafiei, M. H., & Adeli, H. (2016). Sustainability in highrise building design and construction. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 25(13), 643–658.

38. Raji, B. (2018). Sustainable high-rises: Design strategies for energy-efficient and comfortable tall office buildings in various climates. A+BE, 8(19).

39. Reinhart, C. F., & Wienold, J. (2011). The daylighting dashboard. Building and Environment, 46(2), 386–396.

40. Rowley, A. (1996). Mixed-use development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking? Planning Practice & Research, 11(1), 85–98.

41. Sojib, M. R. H., et al. (2025). Land use land cover transformation and seasonal variations in land surface temperature with environmental implications in Gazipur Sadar Upazila, Bangladesh. Urban Climate, 59, 102662.

42. Turok, I., & McGranahan, G. (2013). Urbanization and economic growth: The arguments and evidence for Africa and Asia. Environment and Urbanization, 25(2), 465–482.

43. UN-Habitat. (2020). World cities report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization.

44. UN-Habitat. (2022). World cities report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities.

45. Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Conservation Foundation.

46. Wood, A., & Salib, R. (2013). Guide to natural ventilation in high rise office buildings. Routledge/CTBUH.

47. Yeang, K. (1999). The green skyscraper. Prestel.

48. Yeang, K. (2008). Eco skyscrapers. Images Publishing.

49. Yudelson, J. (2009). Green building through integrated design. McGraw-Hill.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-05

How to Cite

Integrating Commerce, Work and Public Life: A Sustainable Mixed-Use High-Rise Development Framework for Gazipur, Bangladesh. (2026). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS), 1(III), Page 32-49. https://jamsjournal.org/JAMS/article/view/716

Similar Articles

21-30 of 307

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.