Human-Centred Leadership in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Framework for Trust, Judgment and Organizational Well-Being

Authors

  • Ignacio Bonasa Alzuria Universidad de la Felicidad y del Bienestar, Mexico Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.590

Keywords:

human-centred leadership; artificial intelligence; organizational well-being; trust; ethical judgment; human skills

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how organizations allocate attention, interpret data and make decisions. Yet the growing technical capacity of organizations does not automatically produce better leadership. This conceptual review develops a human-centred framework for integrating artificial intelligence into leadership practice without weakening judgment, trust, responsibility or employee well-being. Drawing on research in leadership, organizational psychology, human-AI collaboration and responsible AI, the article distinguishes between tasks that can be delegated to computational systems and responsibilities that remain irreducibly human. It proposes four mutually reinforcing leadership capabilities: augmented judgment, relational trust, ethical accountability and purposeful adaptation. The paper argues that AI creates the greatest organizational value when it expands the leader’s capacity to listen, anticipate and learn, rather than when it is used simply to accelerate control. Practical implications are presented for executive teams, educators and organizations designing AI-enabled work. The contribution is a multidisciplinary model that treats technological adoption and human flourishing as complementary design objectives rather than competing priorities.

35 14

References

1. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2023). Generative AI at work. NBER Working Paper No. 31161.

2. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

3. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

4. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586.

5. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410.

6. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210.

7. Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83.

8. UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO.

9. World Health Organization. (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. WHO.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-23

How to Cite

Human-Centred Leadership in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Framework for Trust, Judgment and Organizational Well-Being. (2026). Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS), Page 235-238. https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.590

Similar Articles

1-10 of 132

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)