Energy-Efficient Hydraulics in Heavy Machinery: A Review of Technologies and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68050/JAMS.2026.213Keywords:
Hydraulic Systems; Energy Efficiency; Electro-Hydraulic Actuators; Digital Hydraulics; Energy Recovery; Heavy Earth-Moving MachineryAbstract
Heavy earth-moving machinery is essential for construction, mining, and infrastructure development, but its traditional hydraulic systems, powered predominantly by diesel engines, are major contributors to energy losses and inefficiencies. Hydraulic circuits typically account for significant parasitic losses due to throttling, leakage, and limited energy recovery, resulting in high fuel consumption and emissions. This review paper comprehensively examines recent innovations transforming hydraulic technology to improve energy efficiency and sustainability. The paper highlights advancements such as electro-hydraulic actuators, independent metering systems, and digital hydraulics, which enable precise flow control and minimize throttling losses. The integration of energy recovery systems, including hydraulic accumulators and hybrid architectures, is discussed in detail, demonstrating how these technologies capture and reuse energy during braking and lowering operations. Additionally, the adoption of smart sensors, predictive analytics, and advanced control algorithms enables real-time optimization of hydraulic performance, reducing idle losses and improving overall system responsiveness. Emerging trends such as fluid power electrification, compact high-pressure components, and the use of eco-friendly hydraulic fluids are also examined. By synthesizing current research and industrial practices, this paper provides insights into the challenges, opportunities, and future prospects for achieving substantial energy efficiency gains through next-generation hydraulic technologies in heavy earth-moving equipment.
References
1. Achten P, Brink T, van den Oever T, Potma J, Schellekens M. Dedicated design of the hydraulic hybrid excavator. Proceedings of the 10th International Fluid Power Conference; 2016 Mar 8-10; Dresden, Germany. p. 313-328.
2. Axin M. Fluid power systems for mobile applications with a focus on energy efficiency and dynamic performance . Linköping: Linköping University; 2013.
3. Axin M, Eriksson B, Palmberg JO. Energy efficient fluid power systems for mobile machinery – a comparison. Proceedings of the 8th International Fluid Power Conference; 2012 Mar 26-28; Dresden, Germany. p. 423-438.
4. Bhola M, Wrat G. Energy-Efficient Hydraulics in Heavy Machinery: Technologies, Challenges, and Future Directions. Sustainability. 2026;18(1):302.
5. Bosch Rexroth. Data-driven Connected Hydraulics in Advanced Manufacturing [Internet]. Singapore: Bosch Rexroth; 2026 [cited 2026 Mar 19]. Available from: https://www.boschrexroth.com/en/sg/academy/brrtc-trainings/data-driven-connected-hydraulics-in-advanced-manufacturing/
6. Cheng M, Xu B, Zhang J, Yang H. A novel pump displacement controlled system for multi-actuators with energy recovery. Proceedings of the 10th International Fluid Power Conference; 2016 Mar 8-10; Dresden, Germany. p. 449-462.
7. Chiang MH, Chen CC, Kuo CFJ. The high response and high efficiency velocity control of a hydraulic injection molding machine using a variable rotational speed electro-hydraulic pump-controlled system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2009;43(9):841-851.
8. Cho SH, Noskievič P. Position tracking control with load-sensing for energy-saving valve-controlled cylinder system. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2012;26(2):617-625.
9. Ding R, Zhang J, Xu B, Cheng M, Pan M. Energy efficiency improvement of a novel hydraulic system with independent metering control for construction machinery. IEEE Access. 2018;6:67158-67170.
10. Du C, Plummer AR, Johnston DN. A new load-prediction based variable supply pressure control for multi-axis hydraulic systems. Proceedings of the 11th International Fluid Power Conference; 2018 Mar 19-21; Aachen, Germany. p. 476-489.
11. Eriksson B. Mobile fluid power systems design with a focus on energy efficiency . Linköping: Linköping University; 2010.
12. Finzel R, Helduser S, Jang DS. Electro-hydraulic dual-circuit system to improve the energy efficiency of mobile machines. Proceedings of the 7th International Fluid Power Conference; 2010 Mar 22-24; Aachen, Germany. p. 367-380.
13. Ge L, Quan L, Li Y, Zhang X, Yang J. Characteristics of a Novel Electrohydraulic Multi-actuator System with Low Throttling Losses and Energy Regeneration Capability. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2025;38:114.
14. Ge L, Quan L, Zhang X, Zhao B, Yang J. Efficiency improvement and evaluation of electric hydraulic excavator with speed and displacement variable power source. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017;150:720-730.
15. Hagen D, Padovani D, Choux M. Enabling energy sharing and regeneration in hydraulic systems with self-contained actuators. Proceedings of the 16th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power; 2019 May 22-24; Tampere, Finland. p. 1-12.
16. Hao Y, Quan L, Cheng M, Ge L, Zhang X. Research on the performance of three-chamber hydraulic cylinder for boom energy recovery system. Automation in Construction. 2020;116:103233.
17. Heybroek K. Saving energy in construction machinery using displacement control hydraulics Linköping: Linköping University; 2008.
18. Heybroek K, Larsson J, Palmberg JO. Open circuit solution for pump controlled actuators. Proceedings of the 4th FPNI PhD Symposium; 2006 Jun 13-16; Sarasota, FL, USA. p. 27-40.
19. Hijikata S. Hydraulic Hybrid Architecture combining an Open Center with a Constant Pressure System for Excavators. Aachen: Shaker Verlag; 2024.
20. Huang J, Wang H, Quan L, Ge L. Development of a novel multi-port hydraulic pump/motor for energy recovery systems. IEEE Access. 2019;7:120825-120837.
21. Inderelst M, Losse S, Sgro S, Murrenhoff H. Energy efficient system layout for work hydraulics of excavators. Proceedings of the 8th International Fluid Power Conference; 2012 Mar 26-28; Dresden, Germany. p. 343-356.
22. Ivantysynova M. Innovations in pump design – are there any limits? Proceedings of the 9th International Fluid Power Conference; 2014 Mar 24-26; Aachen, Germany. p. 12-27.
23. Ketelsen S, Padovani D, Andersen TO, Schmidt L, Ebbesen MK. A novel self-contained electro-hydraulic cylinder with series coupling of two fixed displacement machines. Proceedings of the 11th International Fluid Power Conference; 2018 Mar 19-21; Aachen, Germany. p. 490-503.
24. Kim S, Lee J, Kim H. Independent Metering Valve: A Review of Advances in Hydraulic Machinery. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering. 2020;37(8):567-578.
25. Kumar S, Das S, Ghoshal SK, Das J. Review of Different Energy Saving Strategies Applicable To Hydraulic Hybrid Systems Used In Heavy Vehicles. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018;377:012072.
26. Lantto B. On fluid power control with special reference to load-sensing systems and sliding mode control . Linköping: Linköping University; 1994.
27. Lin T, Wang Q, Hu B, Gong W. Research on the energy regeneration systems for hybrid hydraulic excavators. Automation in Construction. 2010;19(8):1016-1026.
28. Lovrec D, Kastreve M, Ulaga S. Electro-hydraulic load sensing with a speed-controlled hydraulic supply system. Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2009;55(3):153-162.
29. MOOG. Electrohydrostatic actuators [Internet]. East Aurora: MOOG Inc.; 2020 [cited 2026 Mar 19]. Available from: https://www.moog.com/products/actuation-systems/electrohydrostatic-actuators.html
30. Nguyen VH, Do TC, Ahn KK. Hybrid powertrain with dual energy regeneration for boom cylinder movement in a hydraulic excavator. Automation in Construction. 2025;171:105974.
31. Padovani D, Ketelsen S, Hagen D, Schmidt L. A self-contained electro-hydraulic cylinder with passive load-holding capability. Energies. 2019;12(2):271.
32. Pate KS. Heavy Equipment Industry: Trends, Challenges, and Strategic Outlook. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University. 2025.
33. Pedersen HC, Schmidt L, Andersen TO, Brask MH. Investigation of new servo drive concept utilizing two fixed displacement units. Proceedings of the 8th International Fluid Power Conference; 2012 Mar 26-28; Dresden, Germany. p. 439-452.
34. Pellegri M. Digital Hydraulics Increase Electric-excavator Runtime. Mobility Engineering Technology. 2026.
35. Qu Z, Zhang J, Xu B, Su Q, Pan M. Energy efficiency analysis of electro-hydrostatic actuator for aerial vehicles. Proceedings of the BATH/ASME 2018 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control; 2018 Sep 12-14; Bath, UK. V001T01A028.
36. Rahmfeld R, Ivantysynova M. Displacement controlled linear actuator with differential cylinder a way to save primary energy in mobile machines. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Fluid Power Transmission and Control; 2001 Apr 3-5; Hangzhou, China. p. 296-301.
37. Romagnuolo L, Frosina E, Rozzi de Hieronymis C, Bordini G, Senatore A. Innovative and self-adaptive energy recovery system in hydraulic cylinders for cyclic operations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2024;2893:012059.
38. Schmidt L, Groenkjaer M, Pedersen HC, Andersen TO. Position control of an over-actuated direct hydraulic cylinder drive. Control Engineering Practice. 2017;64:1-14.
39. Shenouda A. Quasi-static hydraulic control systems and energy savings potential using independent metering fluid power valves . Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2006.
40. Vael GEM, Achten PAJ, Fu Z. The Innas hydraulic transformer the key to the hydrostatic common pressure rail. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2561. 2000.
41. Wang L, Wang Y. Energy-saving control of electro-hydraulic servo system based on variable supply pressure. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Aircraft Utility Systems; 2016 Oct 10-12; Beijing, China. p. 112-117.
42. Wang T, Wang Q. An energy-saving control strategy for electro-hydraulic servo systems. IEEE Access. 2019;7:123456-123465.
43. Williamson C, Ivantysynova M. Pump efficiency approximation for modeling energy efficient fluid power systems. Proceedings of the 7th International Fluid Power Conference; 2010 Mar 22-24; Aachen, Germany. p. 145-158.
44. Xu B, Cheng M, Yang H, Zhang J, Sun Y. A hybrid displacement/pressure control scheme for an electrohydraulic flow matching system. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. 2015;20(6):2771-2782.
45. Yoon JI, Kwan AK, Truong DQ. A study on an energy saving electro-hydraulic excavator. Proceedings of the ICCAS-SICE International Joint Conference; 2009 Aug 18-21; Fukuoka, Japan. p. 3825-3830.
46. Yu YX, Ahn KK. Improvement of energy regeneration for hydraulic excavator swing system using novel hydraulic-electric hybrid system. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems; 2015 Oct 13-16; Busan, Korea. p. 1783-1787.
47. Zhou S, Liu Z, Li M, Liu D, Wang C, Li H. A Study on Fractional-Order Adaptive Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Control for an Excavator Working Device. Applied Sciences. 2025;15(23):12581.
48. Zhou Z. Designing Hydraulic Fluids and Lubricants for the Electrified Era. Power & Motion. 2025 Dec 17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated. Authors retain copyright of their work and grant JAMS the right of first publication.
