Beyond AI Adoption: Aligning the National Curriculum Framework 2021 and Outcome-Based Education with AI-Enhanced Higher Education in Bangladesh
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence; higher education; Outcome-Based Education; National Curriculum Framework 2021; curriculum alignment; responsible AI; Bangladesh.Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping teaching, learning, and assessment in higher education. However, its educational value depends not simply on the availability of AI tools but on how effectively they support intended learning outcomes and responsible academic practices. This paper proposes a context-sensitive conceptual framework for integrating AI into Bangladeshi higher education by drawing on university-level Outcome-Based Education (OBE) and selected competency-oriented principles from the National Curriculum Framework (NCF) 2021. Through a targeted integrative review of academic literature and relevant policy documents, the study brings together institutional conditions, responsible AI governance, curriculum alignment, intended educational outcomes, and feedback for continuous improvement. The analysis draws on established educational perspectives, including constructive alignment, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, UNESCO's AI competency frameworks, and recent research on generative AI integration. Rather than presenting an entirely new or empirically validated model, the paper offers a conceptual synthesis tailored to the educational and institutional context of Bangladesh. Although the framework provides a basis for examining responsible and outcome-aligned AI integration, its distinctiveness requires further comparison with existing models, and its proposed relationships need empirical evaluation across universities and academic disciplines in Bangladesh.
References
1. Akter, N., Chowdhury, M. S., Sadique, M. S., Hasan, M. M., & Moral, I. H. (2026). Bridging the gap: Factors influencing AI adoption in higher education institutions in Bangladesh. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 22, Article 006. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2027.22006
2. Belkina, M., Daniel, S., Nikolic, S., Haque, R., Lyden, S., Neal, P., Grundy, S., & Hassan, G. M. (2025). Implementing generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: A systematic review of case studies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100407.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100407
3. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Open University Press.
4. Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
5. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
6. Liang, J., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. T. L. (2025). A systematic review of the early impact of artificial intelligence on higher education curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1522841. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1522841
7. Ministry of Education. (2021). Bangladesh national qualifications framework (BNQF). Government of Bangladesh.
8. Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.
https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
9. Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO.
https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835
10. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
11. National Curriculum and Textbook Board. (2021). National curriculum framework 2021: Pre-primary to Grade 12. https://nctb.portal.gov.bd/pages/static-pages/6922dc5d933eb65569e0ff0f
12. Sun, D., Ba, S., Cha, Y., Yu, J., Chiang, F.-K., Dai, H. M., & Lim, C. P. (2026). Empowering university teachers in higher education: A generative AI-responsive competency framework. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10, Article 100542.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100542
13. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
14. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research.
https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
15. University Grants Commission of Bangladesh. (2021). Template of outcome based education (OBE) curriculum (revised). https://ugc.portal.gov.bd/pages/policies/template-of-outcome-based-education-obe-curriculum-revised-54d910-6922d906dbfbab28ce047b9f
16. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
17. Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., Román-González, M., & Noor, N. M. (2024). Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review. Review of Education, 12(2), Article e3489.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3489
18. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (JAMS) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated. Authors retain copyright of their work and grant JAMS the right of first publication.
